Referee Michael Salisbury and VAR make a doable error in Wolves’ loss to Leeds United after lacking a penalty on Nelson Semedo.
Referee Michael Salisbury and VAR could have made an enormous mistake in Wolves’ newest defeat after lacking an eventual penalty for a foul on Nelson Semedo.
What’s new on Wolves and VAR?
Officers had been definitely the focal point at Molineux this weekend within the Premier League as Julen Lopetegui’s facet misplaced 4-2.
Certainly, Leeds United managed to assert victory as Jonny and Matheus Nunes had been each despatched off whereas the Whites additionally benefited from a controversial resolution when Rodrigo sealed victory with a late fourth.
Additionally, as seen in Sky Sports activities recreation highlights, with Wolves solely 1-0 up, Semedo fees into the field and appears like he was fouled.
Did Wolves deserve a penalty for the doable foul on Semedo?
The referee didn’t point out the spot stay and when VAR reviewed it they felt it was high-quality to let the incident cross with out asking Salisbury to test the monitor.
Because the footage clearly exhibits, nevertheless, Leeds defender Junior Firpo stretches to clear the ball however finally ends up kicking his opponent’s foot and bringing it down.
It definitely seems like that is a kind of choices the place VAR would not have overturned the choice had referee Salisbury given the penalty in actual time. And had he been requested to test the Monitor, it is arduous to see Firpo getting away with it unpunished.
After the sport, supervisor Lopetegui definitely seemed livid on the incident, telling BBC Sport: “I perceive errors as a result of it is human. I noticed the (potential) penalty in opposition to Nelson Semedo – he has an harm to the knee (due to the problem) and (Junior Firpo) doesn’t contact the ball.
“The referee has a incredible view for tv. I do not know why he would not change the choice.”